Healthcare industry

Key Facts

The healthcare industry is becoming increasingly important as a special factor in the Austrian economy with its productivity, interconnectedness, intermediate input structure, export opportunities and employees. For a long time, health was only seen as a cost factor.

The healthcare industry includes not only the healthcare sector in the narrower sense, but also many other areas whose growth is largely determined by the need for health.

The gross value added of the entire healthcare industry in Austria accounts for 10.85% of the overall economy according to IHS 2017.

Current healthcare expenditure in Austria* in 2023 amounts to EUR 52,280 million according to the Ministry of Health (the public share of current healthcare expenditure is 77.1%). 

Around three quarters of current healthcare expenditure is covered by public funds, including expenditure by social insurance institutions, the federal government, the federal states and the municipalities*. One quarter is private healthcare expenditure and, in addition to expenditure by private households, also consists of expenditure by private insurance companies and other private non-profit organizations as well as company medical services*.

More than 3.5 million Austrians have private health insurance**.

*Source: STATISTICS AUSTRIA, Health expenditure in Austria according to the System of Health Accounts (SHA 2011 (OECD/Eurostat/WHO)). Created on 12.06.2024.
**Source: Annual report VVO 2023

Financing

If an inpatient stay in hospital is necessary for the treatment of an illness, costs are incurred, e.g. for the medical examination and treatment of the patient, the necessary remedies, care, accommodation or meals.

In Austria, healthcare is provided through compulsory insurance based on the social insurance model. Social insurance is mainly financed by insurance contributions. The federal government regulates the hospital system in principle, while the federal states are responsible for implementation. The Austrian healthcare system is financed by social insurance contributions, tax-financed public funds and private co-payments in the form of direct and indirect cost sharing (e.g. "daily allowance", patients' contribution to the cost of meals, prescription fees, co-payments, private health insurance).

Private hospitals receive funding from the Private Hospitals Financing Fund(PRIKRAF) for services for which there is an obligation to pay social insurance contributions in accordance with the rules of performance-oriented hospital financing (LKF model). The PRIKRAF, in turn, is financed by funds from domestic social insurance providers for inpatient and day-care services and nursing cost subsidies for treatment in a PRIKRAF hospital, by reimbursement amounts from foreign insurance providers and by investment income.

Private hospitals are primarily financed by payments from private health insurance companies, which they receive on the basis of direct settlement contracts for the treatment of privately insured or additionally insured persons, as well as from direct payments from non-privately insured patients. In addition, they receive social insurance cost contributions for persons who are subject to compulsory social insurance. These contributions are processed via the Private Hospitals Financing Fund (PRIKRAF).

The social security contributions that private hospitals receive for their services are significantly lower than those received by public hospitals for the same services. In 2022, the Austrian social security system paid an average contribution of between EUR 0.72 and EUR 0.76 per LKF point for inpatient care at all fund-financed hospitals across Austria. In 2022, the social insurance system provided a funding contribution of EUR 0.455 per LKF point for services provided by PRIKRAF clinics. Public hospitals receive an average of EUR 0.72 to 0.76 per LKF point from Social Security (a total of EUR 1.97 in public funds). PRIKRAF clinics currently receive EUR 0.45.*

In terms of the final inpatient costs per stay billed via the respective fund, PRIKRAF is around 70% below the average value of the provincial funds. There is also unequal treatment of services in the area of PRIKRAF compared to services financed by provincial funds in that co-insured patients' shares must be offset in accordance with Section 447f ASVG for private hospitals, but not for public hospitals. The financing of the different groups of hospital operators (public non-profit, private non-profit and private) is characterized by very different structural framework conditions, as, among other things, the LKF point values vary greatly and thus investment financing and financing gaps in the operational area are also addressed differently. Gaps in financing are closed in the area of public non-profit hospitals by means of disposal financing including loan authorizations. In the case of private hospitals, income from other areas must generally be used.**

* SOURCE: Contax 2024 Study
** Source: Haber 2017 Study

Modern healthcare systems

The role of the private sector in modern healthcare systems is clear. The proportion of privately owned healthcare companies varies widely across European countries, with the interaction between public and private showing clear advantages. Most countries use the private sector in the healthcare industry to increase the quality and efficiency of the entire national healthcare system, promote innovation and ensure freedom of choice. In Austria, the market share by beds of non-public private providers is just over 10%*. In comparison, the share of private providers in Germany and Italy is around 30% and in France over 20%*.

Across Europe, the number of acute beds is falling in favor of outpatient and day clinic stays. This trend is being accelerated by innovations, telemedicine and new technologies. 

A modern, highly effective healthcare system requires a clear commitment to diversity of ownership with a balanced share ratio. Transparency and comparability of the services and financing of all players in the healthcare industry and an increase in the effectiveness of the use of funds are also essential for this. The principle of equal remuneration for comparable services should be a matter of course.

*Source: IHS 2019